Alternative C
Multiple-Hub Centres

The Multiple-Hub Centres
Alternative shows a variety of centres, with different levels of
service, dispersed throughout the region.
Like the other alternatives,
this pattern of growth builds on the foundation strategy, which
includes elements like supporting a strong regional economic centre,
establishing compact, mixed-use communities, protecting open space,
offering affordable housing choices, ensuring energy efficiency
and protecting valuable cultural and heritage landscapes.
Alternative C includes a mix of all five centre types. With each
type getting successively smaller they are: the regional centre,
major centres, rural centres, smaller community hubs and neighbourhood
villages.
Neighbourhood villages would be primarily residential, but more
compact than conventional suburban subdivisions. Zoning would provide
for conveniences like small shops and daycare centres located in
the centre of the village.
Like Alternative B, some rural centres would be designated for municipal
services like piped water and sewer and some form of public transit.
Other locations would be designated as a community hub, with some
type of small scale shared sewage system.
Neighbourhood villages could also
take advantage of shared septic systems. Basic public transit service
would be provided close to the centre for urban and suburban neighbourhood
villages, while more rural areas could offer services like dial-a-ride,
shared taxis or ride sharing clubs.
While this alternative provides the most opportunity for rural growth,
it also means higher density than rural communities have seen in
the past. With more growth focused in rural centres, more choices
would be available for locations to live. There would be higher
costs associated with providing services to a wider range and a
larger number of centres and/or services would be spread more thinly.
|